Historical argument
Evaluate a historical argument
Develop a balanced argument, weigh factors and reach a supported judgement.
8 sittings · 46 linked pages
Repeated appearances grouped into this type.
2017–2026 · National 5 & Higher
529 distinct skill groups across 14 subjects. Find a question type, open an example in its original paper and check the published marking instructions. Repeated appearances are grouped, not duplicated.
These are provisional skill groups linked to real papers, not copied questions or newly written worked solutions. Repeated appearances share one entry. Some text still needs classification and 3 scanned question papers need OCR, so not every type is verified yet.
2020 and 2021 exams were cancelled. Older questions may use a different course or marking format.
6 distinct types · Higher
Historical argument
Develop a balanced argument, weigh factors and reach a supported judgement.
8 sittings · 46 linked pages
Repeated appearances grouped into this type.
Knowledge and understanding
Explain how each factor contributed, using precise recalled knowledge.
8 sittings · 42 linked pages
Repeated appearances grouped into this type.
Source skills
Analyse the interpretations in both sources and contextualise them with recalled knowledge.
6 sittings · 30 linked pages
Repeated appearances grouped into this type.
Source skills
Use the source, identify its limits and supply relevant recalled knowledge.
8 sittings · 40 linked pages
Repeated appearances grouped into this type.
Source skills
Make direct, supported comparisons rather than two separate summaries.
2 sittings · 10 linked pages
Repeated appearances grouped into this type.
Source skills
Evaluate origin, purpose and content, supported by relevant contextual knowledge.
8 sittings · 40 linked pages
Repeated appearances grouped into this type.
Rule-assisted question-family grouping from the audited PDF text. One entry per subject, level and skill family; repeated years and examples are grouped, not separate types. Identical normalised page text within a sitting is linked once, preferring split papers over combined copies. Sources open the original PDF page. Classification is provisional, not a claim of exhaustive syllabus coverage or independent subject-review sign-off. Counts below are skill groups and linked question documents, not question counts or exam predictions. Text-segment counts may include extraction fragments and are not counts of unclassified questions.